iCIMS

Also written as：ICIMS

Timeline

Newest first

22:17
United States·Research
iCIMS expert says silence on AI use in hiring 'not neutral'; 44% of surveyed jobseekers have not encountered AI screening
iCIMS' Trent Cotton warned employers that staying silent on AI use in hiring is 'not neutral', stressing disclosure when AI evaluates candidates. In an iCIMS survey of 1,000 US jobseekers, 44% had never encountered AI screening this year and 32% encountered it several times or in most searches. An iHire report found 44.3% increasingly view employers' AI use in hiring negatively.
via Human Resources Director
09:08
United States·Research
iCIMS and Kyle & Co. report links AI deployment to stronger hiring performance
iCIMS and Kyle & Co. released the 2026 Talent Transformation Yearbook: AI Progress Report, surveying 500 HR and talent leaders and 1,000 U.S. job seekers. It found 45% rated AI implementation highly successful, while the average organization puts only about half of purchased AI capabilities into production. iCIMS cited customer first-year savings of nearly $2 million.
via PR Newswire

09:54
United States·Partnership
Recruitment marketing firm HireClix joins Workday Partner program
Recruitment marketing company HireClix announced it has joined the Workday Partner program, giving Workday customers access to HireClix's career site services via the Workday Marketplace to boost job visibility and employer branding. Separately, ICIMS announced that LinkedIn Recruiter System Connect Plus (RSC+) for Hiring Assistant will be available for the ICIMS Applicant Tracking System, expected to launch in Spring 2027.
via HR Tech Feed
04:11
United States·Policy & Law
Sirius XM wins dismissal of AI hiring bias lawsuit
A federal judge in Michigan dismissed without prejudice an AI hiring bias lawsuit against Sirius XM on Sept. 30, 2026. Applicant Arshon Harper alleged the company's iCIMS AI features scored candidates using race proxies after he was rejected from roughly 150 applications between Nov. 2023 and Nov. 2024. The judge found he failed to plead sufficient facts for intentional discrimination or disparate impact claims.